................................................................................................................................................................................
Interiors - Exteriors
Conservative - Liberal
Individual - Environment
................................................................................................................................................................................
The typical liberal, recall, does not believe in interior causation, or
even in interiors, for that matter.
The typical liberal epistemology
(e.g., John Locke) imagines that the mind is a tabula rasa, a
blank slate, that is filled with pictures of the external world.
If
something is wrong with the interior (if you are suffering), it is
because something is first wrong with the exterior (the social
institutions)—because your interior comes from the exterior.
This "blank slate" view of the human mind—with its correlates in a
psychology of behaviorism and associationism, and an epistemology of
empiricism—was adopted by liberalism for many reasons, not least of
which that promised the "unlimited perfectibility" of human beings
through various types of objective social engineering.
All innate
differences, capacities, and structures were summarily rejected, and
human beings, born in a state rather akin to a blob of silly putty,
could thus be molded by exterior institutions and forces (behaviorism,
associationism) into any desired state.
James Mill and his son John Stuart Mill embraced these ideas for a
simple reason: "In psychology," John wrote of his father, "his
fundamental doctrine was the formation of all human character by
circumstances [objective causation], through the universal principle of
association, and the consequent unlimited possibility of improving the
moral and intellectual condition of mankind…."
This improvement could
occur by behavioristic education, where the proper exteriors are
imprinted on the interiors; or, especially in later versions, by more
aggressive social engineering (which is why behaviorism—no matter how
crude and incorrect in most respects—remained the state psychology of
the Soviet Union, and it remains the implicit psychology of many forms
of traditional liberalism).
"In one of his earliest speeches, [John Stuart] Mill announced that he
shared his father's belief in perfectibility; that same faith is no less
strongly expressed in the last of Mill's writings.
Innate differences
he always rejected out of hand, never more passionately than in his The Subjection of Women
(1869), in which he argued that even 'the least contestable
differences' between the sexes are such that they may 'very well have
been produced by circumstances [objective causation] without any
differences of natural capacity [subjective causation]."
Always there
is the blank slate, into which a more perfect world will be poured from
the outside, with no thought that there might be realities on the
interior that need to be addressed as well.
The "blank slate" meant
radical social policy. "Associationism, in Mill's eyes, is not merely a
psychological hypothesis, to be candidly examined as such: it is the
essential presumption of a radical social policy."
[Ken Wilber]
'Some Thoughts on Integral Politics'
................................................................................................................................................................................
We [...] need to abandon the Marxist critique of race, and accept that human beings are fallible creatures who discriminate and pre-judge and sometimes fall below the standards required of the anti-racist lobby;
and that it is impossible to create a society based on the assumption that people are perfectible.
[Ed West]
The Diversity Illusion, p. 239
................................................................................................................................................................................
Related posts:-
Circle / Spiral / Line
Individual v Environment
Onwards and Upwards
Who's Steering the Ship?
Limited/Limitless